5

The population bomb

jerry submitted, created time 4 months 2 days (www.current-biology.com)

The biologist Paul Ehrlich came to public attention in 1968 with the publication of his book, The Population Bomb. Worries about the potential problems of a soaring global population had boiled and cooled over previous decades. And the issue had become so enmeshed with political decisions that many just wished to ignore it. The warnings of Thomas Malthus, the eighteenth-century writer who had had such influence on many thinkers on the problems of uncontrolled population growth, had slipped into the background. But with the current surge in commodity prices around the world the issue of the size of the population is once more rapidly moving up the global agenda. And it is interesting to see this 40-year-old perspective.

Ehrlich chose to emphasise the simple biological challenges posed by rising populations. And he was strident: “It cannot be overemphasised,” he wrote, “that no changes in behaviour or technology can save us unless we can achieve control over the size of the human population. The birth rate must be brought into balance with the death rate or mankind will breed itself into oblivion. We can no longer afford merely to treat the symptoms of the cancer of population growth; the cancer itself must be cut out,” he wrote.

“The rich may continue to get richer, but the more numerous poor are going to get poorer. Of these poor, a minimum of ten million people, most of them children, will starve to death during each year of the 1970s. But this is a mere handful compared to the numbers that will be starving before the end of the century. And it is now too late to take action to save many of these people.
Ehrlich's predictions have not been founded in events, but there is no doubt that many people in poorer countries receive inadequate food. But Ehrlich's purpose was also to highlight the developed countries' situation. “Most Americans are not aware that the US and other developed countries also have a problem with overpopulation. Rather than suffering from food shortages, these countries show symptoms in the form of environmental degradation and increased difficulty in obtaining resources to support their affluence.”

 
sea-maid commented 4 months ago - Re: The population bomb
0     
As the global population problem increases, serious problems seem likely to occur. All sectors of the economy will experience price increase and demand due to resource shortages.
Darkfrog commented 4 months ago - Re: Re: The population bomb
1     
I disagree a little on one point. I think that changed behaviors, such as better farming and food delivery techniques (and further mangling of our environment) can mitigate the effects of overpopulation. However, I agree that managing the birth rate is the most direct way to solve the problem (which includes the mangling of our environment).
sea-maid commented 4 months ago - Re: The population bomb
0     
Surely, better farming and food delivery techniques can mitigte the effects of overpopulation, but I think it have some difficult to do it.
NOTE: Please Sign in or Register first
Comment Subject      
Content
This comment is my hypotheses
 

About Us
DiscoveR8 is a user-driven website dedicated to the dissemination and intelligent discussion of life science news, discoveries, hypotheses, and procedures. Our users are our sources, editors, and peer reviewers.
More...
Report Abuse
abuse@discover8.com
100 bp DNA Ladder - ready-to-useTM
DNA Marker: 100 bp DNA Ladder - ready-to-useTM
www.genscript.com
Apamin
Apamin, a bee venom polypeptide, blocks specifically the Ca2 ...
www.genscript.com
Rabbit Anti Ezrin (Phospho-Thr566) (polyclonal)
antibody : Rabbit Anti Ezrin (Phospho-Thr566) (polyclonal) ...
www.genscript.com
Rabbit Anti HSF1 (Ab-303) (Polyclonal)
antibody : Rabbit Anti HSF1 (Ab-303) (Polyclonal)
www.genscript.com